Each matter handled by Daniel is dependent upon the unique facts and particular circumstances. An example of successful matters handled by Daniel include:
- 416 Route 10 Associates v. East Hanover Township. The Tax Court judge, following trial, accepted the value proferred by the taxpayer’s expert and reduced the plaintiff’s 2010-2015 assessments. The refund was approximately $250,000
- North Avenue East, LLC v. Elizabeth City, Docket Nos.: Following trial of a truck terminal property in the City of Elizabeth, the Tax Court reduced the assessment
- North Main Street Realty v. Borough of Lodi. Following a valuation trial of a waste transfer facility in the Borough of Lodi, the Tax Court reduced the assessment to the value proferred by the taxpayer for all years under appeal
- S. Postal Services v. Town of Kearny, 21 N.J.Tax 78 (App.Div. 2002)
- S. Postal Service v. Town of Kearny, 19 N.J.Tax 282 (Tax 2001)
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State, Director of Div. of Taxation, 19 N.J.Tax 378 (App.Div. 2001)
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. State Director, Division of Taxation, 18 N.J.Tax 291 (Tax 1999)
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
